I have no idea what is going in the metaphors on vision
article. I thought I did, but I don’t. First paragraph is was easy to
understand but then it gets weird. I think I know what its trying to say but
then I’m unsure. I understand it would be cool to experience everything visually without the knowledge knowing what the object or light is. But then goes into death and sexual things. Which is like a "wait what" moment. So weird, artists are so weird.
I did enjoy the kino-eye article. I like how it references camera
technology and how we were developing cameras to mimic the eye. It wasn’t until
we used the camera as a “superior eye” to create images and ideas of things our
eyes normally doesn’t see. The kino-eye can take us to places we would have
never imagined of going. It makes me wonder what visual aspect or new emotions
I can create with my camera. I’m not very good with montages and think it would
be a cool area to explore. With my current project plans, I don’t know how I
would be able to explore a montage with what I am trying to achieve. We shall
see how it goes.
Overall, pretty cool article, its lit.
No comments:
Post a Comment